21世紀の承認政治
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
David Easton defines politics as "authoritative allocation of values". Politics are divided into distributive politics and recognitive ones. Distributive politics is based on welfare value which can be distributed and divided like money, natural resources and food and so forth. Recognitive politics is based on deference value which can be neither distributed nor divided like nationalism, ideology, religion and so forth. The welfare value has its root deep in desires of human beings to live physically. Meanwhile, the deference value has the deep feelings of human beings to live mentally. While distributive politics is based on desires, the recognitive are based on emotions. Although these politics do not exist separately, they do together in one political process. It depends historically which politics are more influential. Roughly speaking, recognitive politics are characteristic to ancient times and the medieval period under strong influence of religions. The origins of recognitive politics is Plato, who thought emotions more important than desires to politics. In the Renaissance, Machiavelli thought desires as much more important than emotions to politics. The modern period, the door of which Hobbes opened in terms of politics, is characterized by distributive politics because it is secularized. Recognitive politics returned to the present post-modern period in the 21st century because of a revitalization of religions like Islam.
- 桜美林大学の論文
- 2006-03-31
著者
関連論文
- 小著小評 『入門・リアリズム平和学』(勁草書房・2009年)
- 平和のリアリズムとはなにか? : ガザで想う
- 講演録(1)米国同時多発テロ事件への視点 (特集:米国同時多発テロ以降の国際社会)
- テロリズムの越境拡散と安全保障の公共政策 (特集 越境するガバナンスと公共政策)
- 21世紀の承認政治
- 米国の対テロ政策と大米華夷秩序の胎動
- 書評 山本吉宣、河野勝編『アクセス 安全保障論』
- サイバーテロの脅威 (情報化社会と警察)
- 目的なきテロをどう防ぐか
- This month 黒色火薬から長篠合戦を読み直す
- テロはなぜ過激化・無差別化するのか (特集 無差別テロの深層)
- 紛争の一般理論化試論 : 「戦争状態仮説」の比較考察