鶴見和子のばあい : 鶴見俊輔試論 : ある知的マゾヒズムの軌跡(IV)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper has two aims. The first is to describe Kazuko Tsurumi as one of the "masochistic" intellectuals. The second is to read Kazuko's articles as a good decoder of Shunsuke Tsurumi's social thought. Kazuko had a kind of social and psychological dilemma. Although she was born in the cultural and social dominant class, she tried to combine with "ordinary people". But she could not. She was criticized and sometimes refused by them. Her early work, Pearl Buck (1953), was produced by her own dilemma. But Kunio Yanagita's folklore was an antidote of her dilemma. Kazuko's yanagitalogy (Yanagita-gaku) is not only a specific theory of social change, but also a theoretical apparatus to solve her distress. The concept of "drifting around (Hyohaku)" becomes new criterion of her sicial activities. At the same time, we can decode Sunsuke's enomous and seemingly contradictory social thought by her yanagitalogy. According to Yanagita, Kazuko said that Japan had multiple social structure and Japanese people did not care there were some, even several, contradictions. She also said that those contradictions could be explained by two concepts, that is, "Icicle model (Tsurara model) of Japanese social structure" and "we all have a primitive man in our mind (Warera no Uchinaru Gensijin)". And these concepts are impotant decoders of Shunsuke's social thought. His "recession project (Taiko Keikaku)" was a kind of trial to find his (our) primitive man. By finding this man, he could describe himself as one of "ordinary people". Since this man, who is a representation of Japanese society, has a lot of contradiction, there is no problem even if Shunsuke's works contain some contradioctions.
- 桃山学院大学の論文
- 2001-07-10
著者
関連論文
- 社交関係の交錯
- 「レッド・ドラゴン」の鏡:視線の狂気
- 鶴見俊輔研究ノート(III) : 「ノートNo.4」「ノートNo.5」より
- 鶴見俊輔研究ノート(II) : 「ノートNo.3」より
- 鶴見和子のばあい : 鶴見俊輔試論 : ある知的マゾヒズムの軌跡(IV)
- 語られない問題 : 鶴見俊輔試論 : ある知的マゾヒズムの軌跡(III)