米国芸術基金(NEA)訴訟を通じてみた芸術支援の一側面 : 芸術への公的助成と議会統制
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Art support by the federal government through NBA has not occupied a big part on the whole as for the art support in the United States. But, NEA has played an important role for the promotion of the U.S. culture, through more than 115,000 NEA grants since its foundation in 1965. The culture war, the confusion of the beliefs and values of the American public in recent years, has exerted a big influence on this NEA as well. Shocking works of Serrano and Mapplethorpe were repulsed from the traditional values of the American public, and the movement to abolish or to restrict NEA support was expanded. Because of this, Congress made some amendments related to the NEA aid in 1989 and 1990. Then NEA became careful for the aid for the controversial arts activities, and didn't recognize the application for Finley. Finley challenged the amendment as violating unconstitutionaly the freedom of the expression of 1st Amendment. This paper tries to analyze the case of NEA v. Finley along with the legislation process of the NEA aid limitation, and also to examine the relation between the direct governmental art support and the congressional control.
- 島根県立大学の論文
- 2003-08-22
著者
関連論文
- 韓国における文化財保護システムの成立と展開 : 関野貞調査(1902年)から韓国文化財保護法制定(1962年)まで(総合政策学)
- 五人の教授のご退職にあたって(真柄欽次教授山田政美教授大野浩教授松岡紘一教授ロード・バーナード教授退職記年号)
- 文化施設の構造改革と評価に関する一考察(浅野雅巳教授・鈴木登教授御退職記念号)
- 米国芸術基金(NEA)訴訟を通じてみた芸術支援の一側面 : 芸術への公的助成と議会統制
- 米国における企業寄付の転換点 : A.P. Smith MFG. C0. v. Barlow et al.事件(1953)
- オランダにおける国立美術館改革 -国立文化施設の民営化