現代自由意志論はどこに向かっているか : Honderich vs. Double論争から見えてくること
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The problem of determinism and freedom is one of the most traditional subjects of philosophy, but in recent decades there has been a great change in the way of philosophizing the problem. This paper has two aims. One is to get a clear view of the change through the works of P. F. Strawson and Ted Honderich. The other is to try to tell what will be at stake in the future free will debate by looking at the recent controversy between Richard Double and T. Honderich. The most important question in the free will debate had been whether the factual concepts of human freedom and moral responsibility were compatible with determinism, before the epoch-making works by Strawson and Honderich were published. At present, many free will theorists are primarily concerned to know whether our attitudes such as gratitude and indignation are compatible with determinism or not. This attitudinal nature is clearly seen in the current free will debate. Double and Honderich shares the same attitudinal stance in approaching the issue of the consequences of determinism, but there is a sheer disagreement of opinion between them, because Double sees no cognitive elements in human attitudes while Honderich asserts that our attitudes contain some factual judgment concerning the initiation of actions. Their controversy suggests that it will be an decisive question in the future free will debate whether our attitudes have cognitive elements or not.
- 広島修道大学の論文
- 1998-03-30
広島修道大学 | 論文
- 幼児の仲間関係における自己主張表現
- 幼児における他者のよくない意図の理解と道徳判断
- 無令状捜索押収と適法性判断(3・完)ー憲法35条による権利保障ー
- 無令状捜索押収と適法性判断(2)ー憲法35条による権利保障
- 逮捕手続に重大な違法があるとして被告人の尿鑑定書の証拠能力が否定され、その派生証拠たる覚せい剤の証拠能力は肯定された事例