PRO and Agree
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In Chomsky and Lasnik (1993) and Martin (1996), it is argued that PRO has null Case. Though the arguments that PRO has Case and that the distribution of PRO depends on temporal properties of non-finite Tense are appealing, the analysis of PRO which relies on null Case is not convincing since there is some doubt as to the existence of null Case. In this paper, I argue against the theory of null Case based on Icelandic control infinitives. Arguing that PRO has nominative Case, I show that the distribution of PRO can be accounted for in terms of Agree, proposed in Chomsky (1998, 1999)
- 札幌大学の論文
- 2002-09-30
著者
関連論文
- 異文化間コミュニケーションから考える日本人の英語運用能力の育成-米国CBS制作「60MINUTES」より-
- 英語の動名詞構文
- 古英語の定動詞第二位について
- 熊谷直治先生を送ることば/略歴/研究業績 (熊谷・高岡・能登先生退職記念特集号)
- 熊谷直治先生を送ることば(熊谷・高岡・能登先生退職記念特集号)
- [研究ノート]コントロールについて : Hornsteinの移動分析の問題点
- Tense Features and Visibility
- The Passive Existential Construction and Derivation by Phase
- PRO and Agree
- Telicity and the Dative Alternation
- Some Notes on Incorporation from Subjects
- Specificity Condition(Commemorative Edition : Professor Kazuo Saito)
- 異文化間コミュニケーション能力育成からみた高校英語教科書分析(内田実・山内孝郎先生定年退職記念号)