EO動詞の下位分類について

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Stroik (1996) tries to explain optional binding phenomena in sentences involving EO verbs by classifying EO verbs into two sub-classes, that is, stative and non-stative. The main purpose of this paper is to examine his analysis. This paper is organized as follows: First of all, a brief review of previous studies is given in order to make the crucial problem clear. Secondly, I show Stroik's argument is unsound. More specifically, the following flaws are pointed out; (1) EO verbs are always stative and cannot be used as non-stative. (2) The sentences he cited in the article are not qualified as the examples including Binding phenomena. Lastly, I show some problems unsettled and propose a plausible solution to them.
つくば国際大学の論文
1999-03-25