イサーク・バーベリのオデッサ神話
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
I. E. Babel's <<Guy de Maupassant>> written in 1932, emerged from the ideas presented in his earlier essay <<Odessa>> (1916). In the story the author himself hints at this by using the coincidence of the story's chronology with the time and the place in which the essay was published, and also by the fact that Maupassant's story <<Confession>> plays a key role in these both works. <<Odessa>> is now considered as Babel's literary manifesto. In this essay, he criticized Russian literature up to his time because of its "stiflingness" and "distortion", a prime example being the myth of "foggy St. Petersburg"; he insists instead on the creation of a new myth, the myth of "sunny Odessa". In this new myth, Babel attempts,unsuccessfully, to realize a life-giving, material-physical based value.The "myth of St. Petersburg" had been put into the consciousness of the literary world by the postimpressionists. The insistence on a new myth in <<Odessa>> formed a link in the chain of the literary endeavors in the 1910's: the return from the impressionists' metaphysics to the material-physical basis. However, the Odessa myth of Babel's, which was purposely created as the opposite of the St. Petersburg's myth, was greatly influenced by the synchronic paradigm of the impressionists; and so, this made him fix Odessa into the eternal phase at about 1905. In addition, in spite of the fact that "values" are essentially born from the difference between various belief systems, Babel embraced a "single-absolute value" (a life-giving, material-physical basis), and refused the intrusion of other values into his literary world. These are the reasons why in the process of the realization of the Odessa myth, Babel fell into a cut-de-sac, from which it was almost impossible to escape. In <<Odessa tales>> (1921-24), written by Babel as the manifestation of his myth, we can find such attempts to avoid contradictions by excluding the historical time from the main stage of Moldavanka, by avoiding a conflict in the plots, and by creating "a vacuum of values" by means of offsetting various values, which inevitably accompany discourses in literary works. But Babel's attempt to realize his Odessa myth soon failed; with his insistence on the "single-absolute value", which necessitated denial of the historical time, this myth essentially aspires for the return to the past. Therefore, it rapidly lost its force in the process of the modernization in Russian society and literature from 1917. The structure of <<Guy de Maupassant>> precisely reproduces the bipolarity presented in <<Odessa>>: the conflict of the "foggy St. Petersburg" with the "sunny Odessa". It also clearly points out the triumph of the former over the latter. This story, written almost at the same time as <<Froim Grach>> which depicts the tragic death of the <<Odessa tales'>> heroes, is considered as Babel's requiem devoted to the already ruined literary ideal of his youth.
- 1999-03-31
著者
関連論文
- ブリヤートの地でバレエ『麗しのアンガラ』を観て
- 歴史への内在 : ボリス・エイヘンバウムの世界観
- 書評 乗松亨平著『リアリズムの条件--ロシア近代文学の成立と植民地表象』
- 誰のものでもない言葉 : 1970-80年代のマンガの言語位相について
- 岩本和久著, 『沈黙と夢 : 作家オレーシャとソヴィエト文学』, 群像社, 2003年
- ブロツキイの詩学における普遍性と不連続性について
- 遍在する「私」 : ヨシフ・ブロツキイの詩学について
- 脱出、空虚、ロシア:ペレーヴィン文学の時空間 (現代文芸研究のフロンティア(6))
- ペレーヴィンはどこへ行く (特集2 現代ロシアの若者文化)
- マンガにおけるデフォルメの位相について
- ロトマン『物と空虚とのあいだで』読解 : 構造という閉域をめぐる言説の諸類型
- Яков Гордин. Кавказ: земля и кровь. Россия в кавказской войне 19 века〔和文〕
- 線としての境界 : 現代ロシアのコーカサス表象
- 「ロシア・ポストモダニズム」におけるロトマンの影 (特集 北緯R度の文学)
- 顕示する「私」 : トルストイとその受容をめぐる一試論
- イサーク・バーベリのオデッサ神話
- 「騎兵隊」論 : その成立過程と構造について
- バーベリ『オデッサ物語』論 : 「オデッサ神話」と「讃歌」について
- トルストイ『戦争と平和』における「崇高」の問題
- 1910-20年代のエイヘンバウム : フォルマリズムとの接近と離反の過程
- 1910-20年代のソ連批評理論における声とテキスト
- ゴーリキーの自伝的作品におけるヴォルガの印象の薄さについて