飯塚浩二の地理学史研究
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In this paper, the writer tried to analyse a study of the history of geography by Koji lizuka. The purposes of this study are : 1. What was the way and purpose of his study ? 2. What was the relation between them and the study he really made ? 3. How can we characterize him as a scholar ? As a result of this study, the writer has concluded as follows : 1. He says that in order to investigate into the theories of geography, one must study it critically in connection with the contemporary thought, and consequently one must work out one's own methodology. Thus one can be free from the preconceived idea and can contribute much to the development of geography. Mr. Koji lizuka failed to give any concrete conclusion in most parts of his assertion, as he often cited Lucien Febvre's La Terre et l'Evolution Humaine. 2. Meanwhile, he changed his mind to incorporate the historical economics into the geography, he came to realize the method by which one could adopt the geographical concepts in connection with the contemporary thought. It was by this method that he was able to push his study of the history of geography forward. Although he studied the contemporary thoughts, he did not study the social background. The writer is dissatisfied with him. And regardless of the study he really made approach, he emphasized the point mentioned in l above, as `one's own methodology'. He was influenced greatly by the Vidal de la Blache's theory, but he did not study it critically. It is contradictory to his opinion that the study of geography's history means reconsidaration of one's methodology. 3. The above fact, mentioned in 2, must be critically studied. It is felt that though lizuka's studies were worth appreciaing, but at the same time they lacked in originality.
- 1975-01-20