自然法と市民法 : なぜホッブズは, 「自然法と市民法とは互いに相手を含み, その範囲は等しい」と言明することができるのか
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In H.Warrender's The Political Philosophy of Hobbes, he classifies Hobbes's natural law in civil society as natural law in the old style and natural law in the new style ; the former is the natural law interpreted by the individual and applied by him to his own situation and actions, and the latter is the natural law interpreted by the sovereign authority as part of the civil law (146〜147). According to his classification, the natural law is eternal and the civil law is positive. Then, this interpretation denies Hobbe's assertion that "Civill, and Natural law are not different kinds, but different parts of law." And the relationship between the natural law and the civil law in Hobbes is interpreted by Warrender as follows : this relationship "can be accepted only as applying to the official version of natural law interpreted by the sovereign and supported by his penalties(167)." Warrender goes on to assert that the authentic interpretation of natural law made by the sovereign will present the civil law to the subject which is enforced by public authority. He, therefore, insists that Hobbes put supremacy of natural law over the civil law(169). But this interpretation ignores Hobbes's assertion that "The law of Nature, and the Civill law, contain each other, and are of equall extent." Can Warrender maintain that his interpretation doesn't contradict Hobbes? Now, the modern legal theory enables us to interpret the relationship between the natural law and the civil law in Hobbes. According to this legal theory, the natural law is equivalent to "Handlungsnorm" and the civil law to "Entscheidungsnorm".
- 英米文化学会の論文
- 1994-03-31
著者
関連論文
- ホッブズのリヴァイアサンとは鯨のことか
- ホッブズの哲学における権利と法
- トマス・ホッブズの政治学にみる結婚と家族
- ホッブズの自然法は道徳であるのか
- ホッブズの自然法第1条と第2条について
- 自然法と市民法 : なぜホッブズは, 「自然法と市民法とは互いに相手を含み, その範囲は等しい」と言明することができるのか
- ホッブズの意味論
- ホッブズの市民法とは何か
- 主権者の命令はなぜ法といえるのか : トマス・ホッブズの法哲学研究
- ホッブズは法の素人か : トマス・ホッブズの法哲学研究
- 「トマス・ホッブズにおける自然権と自然法との関係について」
- トーマス・ホッブズの自然状態の性格についての一試論