江戸の下肥値下げ運動と領々惣代
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Amidst the wave of research that is furthering our understanding of blocs of consolidated villages (kumiai mura 組合村), which have been seen as middle level control mechanism within all the territories ruled by the Tokugawa Bakufu, this paper takes up widespread legal petitioning movements carried out by agricultural villages throughout the environs of Edo. In the eleveth month of 1789 (Kansei 寛政 1), a confederation of villages around Edo lodged a complaint with the Bakufu's Taxation and Judicature Functionary (Kanjo Bugyo 勘定奉行) in a legal attempt to bring about reductions in the price of fertilizer-use night soil. At its height, this legal battle brought together a total of 1016 villages, thus rivaling in scale provincial level legal struggles (kokuso 国訴) carried on in the Kinai region of western Japan. The night soil which had accumulated in the townships (machikata 町方) and samurai residential areas (yashiki-kata 屋敷方) of Edo proper was under contract (shimo-soji keiyaku 下掃除契約) collected by surrouding peasants as a valuable source of crop fertilizer. However, during the latter half of the eighteenth century, there appeared certain persons who attempted to capture night soil collection rights from peasants through contract price competition, which resulted in substantial increases in the contract prices offered to the residents of Edo proper. In response to this inflationary situation, the surrounding villages petitioned the Bakufu, based on such intervillage resolutions as bans on such competitive practices and the return of collection rights which had been taken away through such practices. The demands made to the Taxation and Judicature Functionary aimed at an autonomous system of night soil collection and included 1)official recognition of inter-village resolutions, 2)the prohibition of night soil collection by townsfolk not under the control of village administrators, and 3)recognition of contract price reduction negotiations and their dissemination throughout Edo proper. Four years later in the sixth month of 1792 (Kansei 4), a decision was handed down, which refused to recognize inter-village resolutions, but which prohibited townsfolk involvement in collecting and contracting activities, and recognized full agricultural villager control of night soil. Also during this four years period, organized groups of villages were successful in reducing through negotiation the contract price of night soil. After offering a general outline of the litigation movement as a whole, the author turns to the question of how this movement was organized. The most outstanding characteristic of this organization is the fact that it was a total consolidation of villages according to regional units called "ryo" 領 (territories) and irregardless of differences between various feudal lords which ruled over the regions. Ryos were middle level administrative units within the Edo environs and had been organized for the exaction of the various dues to be performed in relation to samurai falconing grounds. Various directives (furetsugi 触次) had been issued to these ryos concerning the control of their villages ; however, execution of these directives was left to a council of village adminitrators within the ryo (ryochu hyogi 領中評議). In the case of the night soil collection rights legal struggle of 1788, a total of 37 ryos took part and a group of 21 petitioning representatives were set up. These representatives, from their bositions on a representative council (ryoryo hyogi 領々評議), both looked into the policies taken by the movement and gave guidance to the villages in drawing up their resolution documents. Therefore, it was through the three levels of village assembly (mura yoriai 村寄合) --- ryo council (ryochu hyogi) --- ryo confederation council (ryoryo hyogi) that the demand of the peasants was taken up and a consensus was reached concerning an autonomous system of night soil collection. This consensus was reaffirmed th
- 財団法人史学会の論文
- 1985-04-20
著者
関連論文
- 幕末の軍制改革と兵賦徴発 (近世・近代移行期研究の展開)
- 日魯から日露へ--ロシアの呼称 (言葉から歴史を考える)
- 幕末の軍事技術と軍制改革 : 国産ライフルの謎 (日本史部会 [第二会場] (近世・近現代) 研究発表)
- 江戸の下肥値下げ運動と領々惣代
- 慶応軍役令と歩卒徴発--幕府組合銃隊一件 (特集 世界史のなかの近世「武士」2)
- 幕末の鎖港問題と英国の軍事戦略
- 幕末維新期の軍事と徴兵 (1993年度歴史学研究会大会報告--歴史のなかの情報) -- (近世史部会--幕末維新期における外交と軍事--近世近代移行期論-2-〔含 討論要旨〕)
- 歴史記録への招待(11)小寺玉晁の風説留
- 幕府の米国式施条銃生産について
- 歴史記録への招待(24)日本沿岸の戦い--攘夷高まる幕末の日本を正確に記した第一級史料
- 歴史記録への招待(23)「通信全覧」「続通信全覧」永く秘匿されていた日本最初の幕末外交史料集
- 歴史記録への招待(22)『旧事諮問録』--旧幕府の"書外の事実"を集めた聞き取り・速記録
- 歴史記録への招待(12)『復古記』
- 歴史記録への招待(10)『杉浦梅潭日記』--幕末の政治動向を詳細に記した幕府官僚の日記