相談過程における関係認知と治療的変化
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This study is an attempt to test and examine hypothesis 1 (a), (b) and 3 in the experimental hypotheses by G. T. Barrett-Lennard. By their hypothesis 1 (a), the relationship variables ad measured after interviews at initiation of therapy, were assumed to be positively correlated with the therapeutic change during the period of therapy. Moreover, these associations were predicted to be stronger when the relationship qualities were measured from client perceptions than when they were measured from therapist perceptions. However converse results have come out in this research. The hypothesis 1 (b) predicted that the relationship as measured from client or therapist perceptions at termination of therapy would also be positively associated with change. For this hypothesis this researcher has found that correlation at termination of therapy was stronger in the case of therapist perceptions than in client perceptions. So far as their hypothesis 3 is concerned, the same outcome has been produced : that is, combined relationship perception total scores of the two participants (clients and therapists) were more associated with therapeutic change than scores of either one of them (the clients or therapists). The fact that could be stated in common after examinations of these three hypotheses in this ; correlation between the variable of empathic understanding and the therapeutic improvement were greatest. From these investigations, the next questions will be presented : 1) The generalization of client perceptions 2) The limitation of perceived relationship inventory. (1) In the proccedure of the generalization of client perceptions by Barreett-Lennard, the response of the differential therapists related to the identical clients would be responsible for the different perceptions of the clients and, hence, for differences in therapy outcome. In this paper, for identical therapist attitude related to different clients, they express different responses. This difference would come out as the variable of empathic understanding in therapist perceptions. (2) Variables of "self-cogruence" and "unconditionality of regard" in therapist perceptions secure the stability of attitude necessary for therapists in spite of therapeutic change. On the other hand, client perceptions are not responses for the three variables (congruence, empathy, and unconditionality) but there are understandable as reflection upon the inner state with dependency, hostility, disturbancy.
- 日本教育心理学会の論文
- 1968-12-15
著者
関連論文
- 3 測定・評価 : e 人格III(日本教育心理学会第9回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 500 臨床・治療(501〜505) (日本教育心理学会第13回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 600 発達障害と適応阻害(651〜7)(日本教育心理学会第12回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 11 相談・治療(1)(日本教育心理学会第11回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 相談過程における関係認知と治療的変化
- 4 臨床 : a 相談・治療(日本教育心理学会第9回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 5 教育臨床心理 : a ガイダンス・カウンセリング(日本教育心理学会第8回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 9-1・2 臨床(日本教育心理学会第7回総会部門別研究発表題目・討論の概要)
- 914 カウンセリングに於ける評定スケールの研究
- 討論の概要(23.心理治療・カウンセリング,日本教育心理学会第5回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要)
- 608 「道徳」授業における教材と学習過程との関係(15.教科・教授過程(1),日本教育心理学会第5回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要)
- 903 集団カウンセリングに於ける治療関係スケールの適用
- 910 動機を持たない非行生徒に対する集団治療の事例研究 (日本教育心理学会第4回総会部門別研究発表要旨・討論の概要 : 23. 心理治療・カウンセリング)
- 道徳的態度の類型化への研究 : 20.学力
- カウンセリング
- 342 道徳性測定における質問紙法の基礎的研究:IV(人格III,3.測定・評価)
- 341 道徳性測定における質問紙法の基礎的研究:III(人格III,3.測定・評価)
- 503 グループ経験による合意的妥当性の研究(臨床・治療)
- 656 対話過程尺度の研究(600 発達障害と適応阻害)
- 1 相談過程における関係認知と治療的変化(2)(11.相談・治療)
- 617 治療関係に於ける基本的態度と相互認知(6.臨床)
- 406 治療関係認知の評定と相談過程の評定との相関性(相談・治療,4.臨床)
- 503 プロセス・スケールの構造研究(a.ガイダンス・カウンセリング,5.教育臨床心理)