「具象(既知対象を描く)」と「抽象(判読[命名]困難な対象を描く)」の間の諸種の変調 III : 絵画教育の一視点
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This is a sequel to two earlier papers which appeared consecutively in "Bijutsukyoikugaku" no. 19 and no. 20. The theme studied in the third paper is "surface. "It's one of the principal subjects on modulation between two seemingly contradictory modalities:representation and abstraction. Because of great historical accumulation, this theme covers actually so many cases of theory and practice that the author must narrow down the range of study. Consequently the following five subitems are reflected here. (1)illusion and physical surface, (2)surface covered with colors, (3)juxtaposition of various types of aplat, (4)reconsideration on landscape, and (5)superiority of touches. After summarily showing the author's opinion as a premise on "surface" in various children's pictures, in the first subitem, he proposes an unseparable relationship between recognizable imagery and physical presence as a unique characteristic of painting. He compares Rembrandt's two works and introduces Nancy W. Berry' s teaching program for analytical observation of Goya' s work. A thematic aspect where two elements(representation and abstraction)are intertwined is more developed in the second subitem in terms of Maurice Donis' famous definition of painting as surface covered with colors. Related to this issue, abstract quality of aplat(a plane painted flat by one color)is interpreted in the third subitem. Paul Gauguin's works in Cloisonistic form are mainly spotlighted as excellent examples through (2) and (3). Quasi-abstractness of landscape is the theme in the fourth subitem. Paul Serusier's Talisman introduced as an example is a repertoire of varied physical presence like fragmentary touches, vivacious brush strokes, many types of aplat interestingly juxtaposed etc. Some children's works which are relevant to the matter are also examined here. The fifth subitem deals with allover condition filled by numerous subdivided touches. In this case, viewers might experience space rather than figures. The author picks up Edouard Manet who created "painture cleire" and Claude Monet who had an inclination for both nonfigurativity and tremendous tangibility. Additionally, he makes reference to students'peculiar works. The matters of Paul Cezanne's well-organized modulation of colorful short touches, relieflike space of Analytique Cubism, experiments of papier colle and so on will be approached in the next paper.
- 美術科教育学会の論文
- 2000-03-21
美術科教育学会 | 論文
- 視覚文化的観点でみる美術史の教育 : デジタルコミュニケーション実践者のための授業展開より
- アートとメディアと人々が出会う場としての地域文化施設 : e-とぴあ・かがわ「ワークショップ・オン・ワークショップ2005」及び他の事例からの考察
- ミューズ教育の研究(VIII) : ミューズ教育思想の歴史的概観
- ミューズ教育の研究(VII) : ミューズ教育思想における諸概念の構造的関係
- ミューズ教育の研究〔VI〕 : ミューズ的なものと政治教育