日本における父親の権威(第2報) : 明治期家父長制度下の父親の権威と現実の父親像との比較
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The objective of this study is to make clear the relationship between the paternal authority and the actual paternal figure, and to examine the reason why the fathers could not establish the paternal authority. The results were as follows: 1.The fathers that were educated with the textbooks in the Meiji era could be classified into seven types. The authoritative fathers were the first and second type only, and they were respected by their children. Most other type fathers could not establish their paternal authority. 2.There were two reasons why they could not establish paternal authority.(1)The civil code and textbooks included some contradictories to patriarchalism.(2)It was under the influence of modern capitablism.
- 日本家庭科教育学会の論文
- 1998-07-01
著者
関連論文
- 児童の被服製作時間の遅速に及ぼす要因 : エプロン製作における実態及び意識調査から
- 児童の被服製作における意識の変化
- 食事中の会話の教育的意義 : 父子の会話の歴史的変遷
- 日本における父親の権威(第2報) : 明治期家父長制度下の父親の権威と現実の父親像との比較
- 日本における父親の権威(第1報) : 明治期家父長制度下の父親像の分析を通して
- 明治期における小学校教科書及び民法の父権思想 : 日本の父親の権威についての研究の一環として