言語の研究とコミュニケーション : 基本的な考え方を顧みる
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In 1920's, Otto Jespersen emphasized the importance of the processes underlying speech. In practice, however, his linguistic description does not necessarily testify to consistent regard to the process of communication. Fumio Nakajima, a critic of Jespersen in Japan, drew upon Anton Marty's philosophy of language and distinguished two levels of communication, namely, the level of <Kundgeben> [=informing] and that of <Mitteilen> [=communicating]. Nakajima's work in grammar and semanctics, however, is in the main restricted to the analysis at the level of informing. This limited perspective on the part of linguists will be liable to reinforce the general public's simplistic view of speech communication, such that language is a vehicle of thought, enabling a person to almost automatically communicate with his or her partner. But recent developments in pragmatics, such as seen in the works by H.C. Grice, G. Leech, D. Sperber=D. Wilson etc. reveal analysed details at the levels of informing and communicating. These will fill the gaps in the general outlook on language which stem from linguists' restricted view of speech communication. As well as the structure of speech communication, the truthfulness of what is communicated in speech is of paramount importance to human life in society. Rhetoric, therefore, will be of increasing relevance as the pursuit of appropriate formation of a truthful text which realizes truthful speech communication.
- 北海学園大学の論文
- 1994-03-31
著者
関連論文
- メーリングリスト・ディスカッションに現れる日本人学生の英語に関する談話分析
- ことば・言語のあり方 : 「言語と文化」考(3)
- 文化・文明と技術 : 「言語と文化」考(2)
- On the Rank of Group : with Regard to NP Structure in Japanese
- 敬譲の"れる・られる"をめぐって
- レジスター管見 : 談話分析の視点から
- 文化と文明 : 「言語と文化」考(1)
- Notes on Vocabulary and EFL
- 言語の研究とコミュニケーション : 基本的な考え方を顧みる
- レジスターとジャンル
- 『授業における自己「改革」』