一般国際法上の紛争の平和的解決に関する研究 : 国連による平和的解決との比較から
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper analyzes peaceful means of international dispute settlement in general international law, such as negotiation, enquiry (inquiry, fact-finding, investigation) mediation (good-offices), conciliation. Six points are concluded in comparing these peace- ful means in general international law with peaceful settlement by the United Nations (UN). 1) Peaceful settlement by the UN is not alternative to peaceful means in general international law. These measures can be synchronously pursued. 2) The UN organs of dispute settlement can carry its task permanently and independently. 3) Peaceful settlement by the UN is more systematic than that in general international law. 4) The UN can use coercive measures .with peaceful measures. 5) Peaceful settlement by the UN is more effective than that of general international law. 6) Peaceful measures by the UN have politically authoritative effect.
- 敬愛大学・千葉敬愛短期大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 極小国際機構と紛争 : グレナダ侵攻を事例として
- 国連における予防外交の概念に関する一考察
- 一般国際法上の紛争の平和的解決に関する研究 : 国連による平和的解決との比較から
- 〈海外レポート〉ヨーロッパ有数の環境都市フライブルク