キェルケゴールにおける「神・人」の逆説について
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
"God-Man" is a paradox. Paradox means the concept which is against reason. "God-Man" means "Unity of God and a historical-real man", so it is paradox. For Kierkegaard thought that there is a qualitative difference between God and man. This qualitative difference becomes clear, when we pay attention to man's "Sin". Then, what is sin ? Here we must know "What is man ?", because sin is some state of man. Kierkegaard said, man is spirit, the self, and a relation which relates itself to its own self. This relation is constituted by God, so it relates itself to God in relating itself to its own self. For this reason, the self is a synthesis of the infinite and the finite, of the eternal and the temporal, of freedom and necessity. But the synthesis is a conflict, and here is paradox of man itself. Now this relation (synthesis), in case of committing fault or man disobeying God, is properly speaking sin. And "Sin" is also paradox. Furthermore Kierkegaard said, every man but Jesus Christ is a sinner. Jesus Christ is the God-Man as an only man without sin. It means, he obeyed God truly. In that case, when we say "Jesus Christ is God", we must give attention to this "Is". It means that there was a man who represented God. And he is paradox. Then, before paradox of "God-Man", there are two paradoxes and those two constitute paradox of "God-Man". In the end, what Kierkegaard called "God-Man" has three points : 1. God who showed himself in mankind. 2. A man who represented God. 3. Unity of God and a man. (True relation between God and man.)
- 東海大学の論文