<論文>離婚の法選択アプローチとしての統治利益分析論の実効性について

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• In the common law world, the question of choice of the applicable law to determine whether relief should be granted has merited little discussion. This is because divorce was regarded as a question of status. Therefore, only the courts of the domicile could have jurisdiction to grant divorces and they applied their own law as the lex fori. In the common law jurisdiction, it is a self-evident truism that the lex fori must be regarded as the law applicable to divorce. In the late 1950s and early 1960s there took place a dramatic revolution in American conflict of laws. Many states abandoned the traditional choice of law approach and adopted a new approach. This new choice of law approach, which is called governmental interests analysis doctrine, focuses on the actual law that competes for application and assesses states' interests in the law selected to control the legal issue in dispute. Has the arrival of interests analysis on the conflicts field led to any change in the American approach to choice of law in divorce? The purposes of this article are to examine the following matters : (1) the difference of approach to divorce choice of law between common law and civil law systems ;(2) the lex fori as the law applicable to divorce ;(3) governmental interests analysis doctrine ;(4) the impact of interests analysis on the American divorce conflicts ;(5) the policies underlying substantive law of divorce and divorce choice of law rules.

• 福岡国際大学・福岡女子短期大学の論文
• 1999-07-30

著者

• 鈴木 敏英

  福岡国際大学国際私法

関連論文

• 渉外家族関係における養子縁組の法的諸問題
• 外国離婚の承認に関するアイルランド国際私法の研究序説
• 渉外的不法行為訴訟における訴権の消滅に関する法律の抵触論考
• アメリカ抵触法における生産物責任に関する最近の法選択アプローチの動向 : 1998年の判決を素材にして
• 国際私法における生産物責任の問題について
• 英米抵触法判例研究(1) : 渉外婚姻の実質的有効性に関する法の選択
• 離婚の法選択アプローチとしての統治利益分析論の実効性について
• イギリス国際私法における夫婦財産制についての法選択規則構造論

スポンサーリンク